On Motion 312
There’s no chance that motion 312 will be passed when it comes to vote in late Spring or early Fall. Gordon O’Connor smacked it down pretty hard on Thursday, and Harper has announced that he will vote against it. I don’t think there is any real and present danger that personhood laws are going to be passed in Canada, or that women’s reproductive rights will be curtailed anytime soon.
At least, not yet. But here’s why it might be worth making some noise. By presenting his motion on the floor Woodworth has already accomplished what he desired: he’s opened a debate on abortion in Canada. Despite Harper’s “read my lips” election promise not to legislate on abortion, the topic is now back on the table. It’s worth showing the Conservative party that they will lose far more votes than they will gain on this issue.
Stephen Woodworth’s framing of the motion in the discourse of civil rights is entirely disingenuous and is clumsily done. His is an “everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you” kind of argument. But it’s also symptomatic: the pro-life movement is increasingly co-opting the language of rights that first won these battles. The argument for the rights of the unborn is meant to distract you from the fact that the real agenda is to restrict the rights of women. Let’s not forget that Woodworth’s motion comes under the penal code heading “homicide.”
I’m not saying you have to dress up as an Atwood character and march on Parliament. Although, you know, that would be cool.